commorancy
-Melanotant-

Are we having fun yet?
Posts: 15
Gender:
|
Thank you for this information. I agree that it is important that potential new users understand the risks and side effects involved in using any of these peptides. While I understand the FDA's point in the warnings, you also have to understand the FDA's goal is both about commerce (read money) and about health of consumers... and, most importantly, weighing the two issues together. To put this in perspective, there are drugs that many of us use every day: alcohol, chocolate and caffeine. Every food you eat, every medication you take, everything you put into your body has the risk of adverse side effects and negative (or positive) interactions with one another. A prime example is alcoholic beverages. Alcohol technically both a drug and a controlled substance. Yet, many people are very casual about it. Informed choices should be the goal of everything you eat and do. That said, there is one point that should not be overlooked. The peptide manufacturers are not under control/regulation of the FDA (or any other governing body) and, thus, quality cannot be guaranteed. But, can it ever be guaranteed even with approved drugs? Quality control, however, is the one thing that is most troubling about obtaining these peptides... Is the quality there? On the other hand, we have the FDA who can't manage to keep people from getting sick because of Salmonella poisoning in Peanut Butter. So, on the one hand you have the FDA issuing warnings about peptides and, on the other, you have them unable to manage food stuffs that should be safe for consumption. Granted, the peanut processing plant didn't do the right things, apparently, but it is still part of the FDA's job to make sure these organizations continue to produce safe goods for consumption. This is the perspective that one needs to understand when taking these warnings into consideration. Ultimately, it's your body and it's your choice. Read, understand and weigh all sides and arguments before you embark.
|